Science vs. Fiction

Flaws in Dating? Roland Watts. Matt’s style is to post a link from a creationist web site, usually Answers in Genesis, which contains the usual bunkum that has been refuted many times then to refuse to acknowledge any rebuttals. Below is a critical look at one of Matt’s typical posts. In this one Matt airs the old creationist claim that the dating system is flawed. On March 10 you posted a link under the heading “Flaws in Dating“. The link ended at an AiG site with an article, Flaws in dating the earth as ancient by Mr.

Choose country

Today, though, a friend of mine shared this youtube video from AiG about radiometric dating, and why it is supposedly unreliable for determining the age of rocks. Now, I am not a scientist, and most scientific discussion makes my eyes glaze over. My brain is wired for literature, poetry, and Biblical Studies. As I watched this short video, though, a few thoughts popped into my head that I just have to share. First, take minutes and watch for yourself. Up to that mark, I was somewhat surprised: AiG gave a straightforward explanation regarding radiometric dating and half-life.

Radiometric dating–the process of determining the age of rocks from the Many Christians accept this and interpret the Genesis account in less scientifically literal ways. My answer is that it is similar to believing in other things of the past​.

As determined by the most recent geological and physical measurements, the Earth is 4. Here are some references that explain the independent scientific methods used to measure this age. Patterson, G. Tilton and M. New Series, Vol. The age of the Earth is a purely scientific issue. It is not a religious, legal, or philosophical issue. While questions like, “How many people should I be allowed to marry? It is not a moral question.

It is a question of the natural world. Some folks, like Terry Mortenson from Answers In Genesis see below, under claimaints , believe scientists cannot address the age of the Earth because no one was there to see it.

The Age of the Earth

See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish. P eople who ask about carbon 14 C dating usually want to know about the radiometric [1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering —the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days?

Christians , by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously. He said,.

Are radiometric methods of dating rocks and fossils reliable? What evidences support a young age for the earth? Where did the idea of “millions of years” come​.

Many get fed up with Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis continually misrepresented normal science. This is a good summary of why his recent porkies are pure Ham. Isochron dating bypasses the necessity of knowing the quantity of initial daughter product in the rock by not using that value in the computation. Instead of using the initial quantity of daughter isotope, the ratio of daughter isotope compared to another isotope of the same element which is not the product of any decay process is used as the comparison for isochron dating.

The plot of the ratios of the number of atoms of the parent isotope to the number of atoms in the non-daughter isotope compared to the number of atoms of the daughter isotope to the non-daughter isotope should result in a straight line that intersects the vertical y-axis which is the ratio of daughter to non-daughter isotopes.

This point of intersection gives the initial ratio of daughter to non-daughter isotopes, which would also be the ratio in a mineral that crystallized without any parent isotope present.

Radiometric Dating Answers In Genesis

Science in Christian Perspective. Radiometric Dating. A Christian Perspective. Roger C. Wiens has a PhD in Physics, with a minor in Geology.

Question: How does carbon dating work? Answer: Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen (N) into.

If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Did humans really evolve from ape-like creatures? Have scientists found fossils of the missing link? What about the similarity between human an chimp DNA? What about the Neanderthal? These and other questions are answered in this Pocket Guide to Apemen.

Experts in the fields of paleontology, anatomy, genetics, and ancient Bible texts examine both the scientific evidence and the biblical record to show that humans are not related to apes, but were specially created by God in His image. Read more Read less. Amazon International Store International products have separate terms, are sold from abroad and may differ from local products, including fit, age ratings, and language of product, labeling or instructions.

Manufacturer warranty may not apply. Learn more about Amazon International Store. No customer reviews.

Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth

NASA’s Genesis spacecraft spent more than two years collecting samples of the solar wind. The spacecraft then brought the sample cannister back to Earth where it parachuted to the ground. Despite a hard landing in the Utah desert, the Genesis samples were recovered. Genesis, the fifth Discovery-class spacecraft, was designed to collect samples of the solar wind and then bring them to Earth.

The collection device, fixed inside the sample return capsule, was made of a stack of four circular metallic trays, one that would be continuously exposed, and the other three deployed depending on particular solar wind characteristics.

Radiometric dating measures the decay of radioactive atoms to determine the age of a rock sample. It is founded on unprovable assumptions such as 1) there.

Let’s move down the article to “Bad Dates. Does that mean the earth is young It means the geologist has to do the best he can with the tools available to date the objects. I’m not going to try to defend these bad date answers. I cahow without the original articles. The creation genesis author is correct in calling this the “dating game. The author uses the verse from Job, ‘Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?

To the carbon I say, “Where were you when God laid the foundations of the investigation? So you can’t “assume” a 6,year-old earth, just like we can’t “assume” a What we have to decide this issue is the evidence from God’s creation, and not our answers. Job How Radioactive is a Day. Nowhere in the Bible does it state that the days of creation are hour days. Radiometric earth creation science advocates will argue over the invalid translation of “genesis.

If you are in the middle of space, what is a “day.

Answers in Genesis’ Deceptive Video on Radiometric Dating

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Is the earth billions of years old or just thousands?

Genesis 1 answers which two questions? in this view, what question is left to estimated by radiometric dating of the oldest rocks on earth, by radiometric dating​.

We are a c 3 non-profit company tax-exempt status approved , so your contributions to our ministry are welcome! Equipping youth pastors, parents, and students with Biblical answers for evolutionary teaching in public schools. Carbon dating assigns ages to once-living materials such as wood, bone, teeth, and shells. Evolutionary researchers do not use it to age-date rocks. It begins by measuring the ratio of radioactive versus stable versions of an element.

Carbon dating works by basing an age calculation on the ratio of radioactive carbon 14 C to normal carbon 12 C in the atmosphere before nuclear bomb testing to the same ratio in the sample.

2. Absolute age dating

The RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees election is completed and the results are posted. Thank you for your interest and participation! Radiometric dating involves dating rocks or other objects by measuring the extent to which different radioactive isotopes or nuclei have decayed.

Answers in genesis isotope dating – How to get a good man. Carbon dating is radiometric dating in genesis, but for the correct answer to radiometric dating.

Others had tried. But Drs Humphreys and Baumgardner realized that there were too many independent lines of evidence the variety of elements used in ‘standard’ radioisotope dating, mature uranium radiohalos, fission track dating and more that indicated that huge amounts of radioactive decay had actually taken place. It would be hard to imagine that geologic processes could explain all these. Rather, there was likely to be a single, unifying answer that concerned the nuclear decay processes themselves.

Since, from the eyewitness testimony of God’s Word, the billions of years that such vast amounts of radioactive processes would normally suggest had not taken place, it was clear that the assumption of a constant slow decay process was wrong Wieland It marks a move away from reliance on ‘appearance of age’ and the arguments of creationists like John Woodmoreappe Plaisted , who asserted that radioisotope dates are the result of filtering essentially random numbers through the institutional biases of science.

These young-Earth creationists now argue that radioisotope decay has actually occurred, can be measured accurately, and that it would require billions of years at present rates to account for the current condition of the Earth. The scientific community has been making those very arguments for decades.

The Prehistoric World Vs. Genesis

The rock walls were slippery and steep at points, and some people came in their dress shoes straight from the conference that brought them together. Let me see that. A brightly painted sign in the state park explained that million years ago these ancient creatures lived at the bottom of a warm, shallow sea during the Ordovician period. But none of these geologists believed it. As young-earth creationists, they think the earth is about 8, years old, give or take a few thousand years.

This figure is based on radiometric dating. Some creationists have attempted to reconcile this figure with the creation in Genesis by proposing that the rocky.

Six research scientists with specialized training in Geology, Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Physics met to report on research completed over the past year. They also discussed plans for future activities. An initial approach taken by some of the investigators is to explore models for accelerated rates of decay of radioisotopes during Creation, the Fall, or the Flood. Several sources of data suggest that significant quantities of radioactive decay have occurred during the history of the earth and cosmos.

The conventional age model assumes that this decay has occurred over billions of years at constant rates rather than in concentrated episodes over short periods of time. Some of the RATE researchers believe other explanations that do not require accelerated decay may be the answer, such as the geochemical distribution of elements. Attention was focused on daughter products of lead, neodymium, strontium, and argon for whole-rock and mineral concentrates.

The various linear array plots could be interpreted as “isochrons” from the different dating methods. However, discordant “ages” resulted, even for mineral concentrates from the same rock. Although the discordant isochron “ages” are the normal pattern, the discordance seems to differ in a predictable fashion. Alpha daughter products give older apparent “ages” than beta daughter products.

Carbon-14 Dating and Biblical History

The chronological figures related to genealogies in Scripture add up to approximately 6, years since the creation of described in Genesis. Many creationists consider these figures to be relatively complete, and thus the Earth is considered to be about 6, to perhaps as much as 10, years old. Biblical scholars do not agree on whether the Bible indicates that the planet Earth was created at the beginning of creation week or if it was already present as a lifeless, wet and dark planet here prior to creation week.

genesis of the Neoproterozoic Jinshan orogenic gold deposit, South ), dating of the ore formation (Wei ; Mao et al. a) and tentative answers.

Your browser or your browser’s settings are not supported. To get the best experience possible, please download a compatible browser. If you know your browser is up to date, you should check to ensure that javascript is enabled. Data revealed differences between the sun and planets in oxygen and nitrogen, which are two of the most abundant elements in our solar system. Although the difference is slight, the implications could help determine how our solar system evolved.

The air on Earth contains three different kinds of oxygen atoms which are differentiated by the number of neutrons they contain. Nearly percent of oxygen atoms in the solar system are composed of O, but there are also tiny amounts of more exotic oxygen isotopes called O and O Researchers studying the oxygen of Genesis samples found that the percentage of O in the sun is slightly higher than on Earth or on other terrestrial planets.

Answers in Genesis Tries to Discredit Radiometric Dating and the Age of the Earth. Feat Purple Dan